
Ichibot is back, and he’s given us a mega-installation. It’s still a work in progress as I write this, so what you see might not be identical to the photos. I’ve put a lot of photos of this work on Flickr — more than are linked into this post — so check that site for the whole story, or better yet, visit Brooklyn is Watching!
The scope of this work is substantial, and some of the parts were originally done for other works by Ichibot. Some of his past themes are also evident, including the puppets with the Hitleresque faces. So the big question is, does this work as a whole? For the most part, I believe that it does; I see a commentary on the potential dehumanizating effects of the Communist regime. (Big blocky architecture like the two social housing builds were one recognizable artifact of the Soviet era.) But Ichibot identifies himself as anti-capitalist, so I believe that we are also meant to read the dangers of capitalist excess as well as Communist excess.
Ichibot informs me that the placement of this work around artoo Magneto’s trees is intentional. He felt that the trees, although pretty, lacked the context they needed to be an effective installation, and so Ichibot supplied some context.

Some parts of this work are rather unsettling, and for me the most disturbing was episodic.social.housing.reterritorialization.01. The photograph above is a view of part of the interior. From the outside, episodic.social.housing.deterritorialization.01
and episodic.social.housing.reterritorialization.01 look like identical Brutalist buildings, but on the inside the latter work contains some rather blobby, vaguely human forms. The bodies look like the result of indulgence and mutation run amok. (They are hideously obese and deformed, and the faces with the truncated mustaches are here again.) If this is the kind of reterritorialization that Communism leads to, I can’t imagine that any of us will want any part of it.
I use the term Communism here to speak of the form of government that the Soviet regime of the cold war had, not what Marx wrote about or the ideal that many people still hold for socialist societies. However we might feel about the merits or demerits of socialism, we can probably all agree that Soviet Russia was not an entirely successful society.
Uncategorized | 2 Comments »